Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX), an NRA-backed gun-rights recommend, pushed aside requires common background tests even after a mass capturing in his personal state that may had been averted by way of any such regulation. His reasoning: he needs with the intention to arm his pals.
Scenarios like this tale are why we give protection to the 2d Modification.
Facet word: With common background tests, I wouldn’t be capable to let my pals borrow my handgun after they shuttle by myself like this. We might make felons out of other folks only for protecting themselves. https://t.co/x60mdd1WW1
— Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) September four, 2019
ABC Information reported on Tuesday that the suspected gunman in a dangerous Hard work Day mass capturing in Odessa and Midland, Texas, had in the past failed a firearms background take a look at however were in a position to get an AR-type attack rifle in a non-public sale throughout the gun-show loophole with out a background take a look at. He allegedly used the weapon to kill seven other folks and injure greater than 20 sooner than police killed him.
Like many different NRA-backed lawmakers, Crenshaw adversarial a common background tests invoice previous this yr claiming that “the entire tragedies we’ve observed, whether or not Parkland, or Sutherland Springs, or the Thousand Oaks tragedy, or Sandy Hook — none of the ones would had been averted” by way of a common background tests regulation.
The reality about common background tests and these days’s vote. %.twitter.com/koigvhKKYT
— Rep. Dan Crenshaw (@RepDanCrenshaw) February 27, 2019
However now that the newest Texas mass capturing undermined his narrative, Crenshaw made a brand new argument on Tuesday.
“With common background tests, I wouldn’t be capable to let my pals borrow my handgun after they shuttle by myself like this. We might make felons out of other folks only for protecting themselves,” he tweeted.
It’s unclear why Crenshaw does no longer imagine his pals may just cross background tests to get their very own guns or to borrow his. If they’re convicted felons who aren’t allowed to own guns, it will appear essential for Crenshaw or different pals to grasp that sooner than arming them.
Elisa Cardnell, a Democrat operating towards Crenshaw in 2020, advised ThinkProgress that she strongly disagrees with the incumbent’s view.
“If you’ll be able to’t cross a background take a look at, you shouldn’t have a gun,” she defined in a commentary. “It’s so simple as that. That is all a part of a repeated development of unhealthy and irresponsible rhetoric from him relating to gun protection. Dan Crenshaw voted towards common background tests as a result of he cares extra in regards to the NRA than our communities. We’d like common background tests and different not unusual sense gun protection regulation.”